A single-deal syndication. You and other investors pool money to buy one specific property. You know the address, the tenants, and the business plan before you invest.

A fund. You invest in a pool of capital that buys multiple properties, sometimes dozens. You might know some of the properties going in, but usually not all of them.

Neither is better in every case. They solve different problems. (New to syndications? Start with Intro to Real Estate Syndications.)

Side-by-side

	Single deal	Fund
What you're buying	One property	A portfolio of properties
Diversification	Low. One building, one market	Higher. Many buildings, tenants, often several states
What you can see up front	Everything about the property	The strategy and criteria, plus whatever has already been bought
Main thing you're betting on	The property and the sponsor	The sponsor's judgment, repeated many times
When your money goes to work	Right away at closing	Often in stages as properties are bought
Exit	One sale or refinance	Buildings may sell over time, or the whole portfolio sells at once
Tax paperwork	One K-1, usually one or two states	One K-1, but possibly many state filings

The case for a single deal

You know exactly what you own. You can pull up the property on a map, read the rent roll, and check the sponsor's numbers yourself.

You can pick and choose. If you like a sponsor's apartment deals but not their office deals, you only invest in the ones you like.

The downside is concentration. If that one property hits trouble, like a big tenant leaving, a bad insurance year, or a loan coming due at the wrong time, all of your money in that deal feels it.

The case for a fund

Diversification is built in. A fund that owns 50 medical buildings across several states doesn't live or die on one tenant. If one building goes vacant, it's a small dent instead of a disaster.

It's simpler to manage. One investment, one set of documents, one K-1 instead of ten.

The downside is you're trusting the sponsor more. In a "blind pool" fund, you're betting the sponsor will keep finding good deals and won't loosen their standards to get money invested.

Cash can sit idle. If a fund raises money faster than it can buy buildings, your capital may wait on the sidelines before it starts earning.

Fees: read the stack

Both structures have fees. With funds, watch for layers.

A typical single deal or direct fund might charge an acquisition fee when buildings are bought and an asset management fee each year. That's normal.

A fund of funds invests in other sponsors' deals. You may pay the fund's fees and the underlying deals' fees. Sometimes that's worth it for the access and diversification. Just make sure you know the total before you sign.

The tax wrinkle nobody mentions

A fund that owns buildings in 12 states may send you a K-1 showing income or losses in each of those states. Depending on the amounts and each state's rules, you might have to file returns in some of them.

Many investors don't need to file in most states because the losses from depreciation offset the income. But ask your CPA before you invest, not after the K-1 arrives.

I'm not a CPA, so please talk to yours before acting on any of this. The tax code also changes often, so take this section as a step in the right direction, not the final word.

The middle ground: deal-by-deal

Some sponsors offer a hybrid. You join a parent fund or investor group, and each new deal is offered separately. You opt in deal by deal.

You get to see each property, as you would in a single deal, and you can spread your money across several of them over time.

Questions to ask either way

For a single deal:

What happens if the largest tenant leaves?
When does the loan mature, and is the rate fixed?
What's the exit plan, and what cap rate does it assume?

For a fund:

How much has already been invested, and in what?
What are the buying criteria, and has the sponsor ever broken them?
How long until my money is fully invested? What does undeployed cash earn?
Are there limits on how much goes into one tenant, market, or property type?
What's the total fee load, including any underlying deals?
How often will I get reports, and what will they show?

And in both cases, the most important question is about the people. Here's how I vet a sponsor.

So which one?

If you're early in your passive investing and don't have a lot of deals yet, a well-run fund can give you diversification in one step that would otherwise take years of picking individual deals.

If you already own several deals, or you have strong opinions about specific markets, single deals give you more control.

Plenty of investors do both. They hold a fund as a diversified core and add single deals around it when something stands out.

Get the next one by email

Join the Vestus network for new posts, deal announcements, and tax strategies for high-income professionals.

Join the network

Want to talk through a deal?

I am happy to answer questions about how any of this works, whether or not you ever invest with us.

Schedule an intro call